Showing posts with label Viking Adult. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Viking Adult. Show all posts

August 18, 2014

Release Day Highlight + Giveaway: Burnt Toast Makes You Sing Good by Kathleen Flinn



Burnt Toast Makes You Sing Good: A Memoir of Food and Love from an American Midwest Family
Author: Kathleen Flinn
Genre: Nonfiction/Memoir
Release Date: August 14, 2014
Publisher: Viking Adult

Description:

A delicious memoir from the author of The Sharper Your Knife, the Less You Cry

In this family history interwoven with recipes, Kathleen Flinn returns readers to the mix of food and memoir beloved by readers of her bestselling The Sharper Your Knife, the Less You Cry. Burnt Toast Makes You Sing Good explores the very beginnings of her love affair with food and its connection to home. It is the story of her midwestern childhood, its memorable home cooks, and the delicious recipes she grew up with. Flinn shares tales of her parents’ pizza parlor in San Francisco, where they sold Uncle Clarence’s popular oven-fried chicken, as well as recipes for the vats of chili made by her former army cook Grandpa Charles, fluffy Swedish pancakes from Grandma Inez, and cinnamon rolls for birthday breakfasts. Through these dishes, Flinn came to understand how meals can be memories, and how cooking can be a form of communication. Brimming with warmth and wit, this book is sure to appeal to Flinn’s many fans as well as readers of Marcus Samuelsson, Ruth Reichl, and Julie Powell.
 


Praise:

“Flinn affectionately recalls her family and growing up in the counties surrounding Flint, Michigan…[She] summons up memories of family dinners and of foods the older women of her extended family cooked so carefully and lovingly.”—Booklist

“A warm, quietly poignant treat.”—Kirkus  
  
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18693752-burnt-toast-makes-you-sing-good?ac=1

KATHLEEN FLINN and her books have been featured in People, ELLE, Bon Appetit, The Wall Street Journal, and on NPR and CBS Morning News. Her first book, The Sharper Your Knife, the Less You Cry was a New York Times bestseller. Her acclaimed second book, The Kitchen Counter Cooking School was named a 2012 Nonfiction Book of the Year by the American Society of Journalists & Authors. Learn more at www.cookfearless.com

Giveaway: The awesome people at Viking are letting me give away (1) hardcover copy of Burnt Toast Makes You Sing Good to a lucky winner! US Only!

a Rafflecopter giveaway


 

August 5, 2014

Author Q&A + Giveaway: The Magician's Land by Lev Grossman

The Magician's Land (The Magicians #3)
Author: Lev Grossman
Genre: Adult, Fantasy
Release Date: August 5, 2014
Publisher: Viking Adult

Description:

In The Magician’s Land, the stunning conclusion to the New York Times bestselling Magicians trilogy—on-sale from Viking on August 5—Quentin Coldwater has been cast out of Fillory, the secret magical land of his childhood dreams. With nothing left to lose he returns to where his story be­gan, the Brakebills Preparatory College of Magic. But he can’t hide from his past, and it’s not long before it comes looking for him.

Along with Plum, a brilliant young under­graduate with a dark secret of her own, Quentin sets out on a crooked path through a magical demi­monde of gray magic and desperate characters. But all roads lead back to Fillory, and his new life takes him to old haunts, like Antarctica, and to buried secrets and old friends he thought were lost for­ever. He uncovers the key to a sorcery masterwork, a spell that could create magical utopia, a new Fillory—but casting it will set in motion a chain of events that will bring Earth and Fillory crashing together. To save them he will have to risk sacrific­ing everything.

The Magician’s Land is an intricate thriller, a fantastical epic, and an epic of love and redemp­tion that brings the Magicians trilogy to a magnifi­cent conclusion, confirming it as one of the great achievements in modern fantasy. It’s the story of a boy becoming a man, an apprentice becoming a master, and a broken land finally becoming whole.
 


https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/19103097-the-magician-s-land?ac=1
Q: People considered The Magicians to be Harry Potter for grown-ups and an homage to writers like C.S. Lewis and J.K. Rowling. But in THE MAGICIAN’S LAND, Quentin is nearly thirty years-old. Can we expect any new allusions to those books? How has the series grown up over the years?

A: On some level all the Magicians books are written as a conversation with Lewis and Rowling. It’s a complicated conversation – sometimes it’s affectionate, occasionally it’s rather heated – and it continues in The Magician’s Land. I thought Rowling let Harry off a little easy by never showing him to us at 30. We never really saw him having to deal with his traumatic past – his abusive childhood, his experience of violence and death, his massive world-saving celebrity as a teenager – and struggling to figure out what the rest of his life is about. Those are things Quentin has to do in The Magician’s Land. When you’re a magician, and there’s no ultimate evil to defeat, when you’re not a kid anymore, what is magic for?

As for Lewis, Narnia fans will pick up echoes of The Magician’s Nephew and The Last Battle, the stories of Narnia’s creation and of its destruction. Lewis made a bit of fetish of childhood and innocence: Narnia was a place for children, and when you grow up and get interested in adult things, you lose that special magic. You see that in Peter Pan too – it’s one of the dominant tropes of 20th century fantasy. In The Magician’s Land I wanted to think not just about what you lose when you grow up, but what you might gain. You lose the magic of innocence and wonder, but do you gain a richer, more complex kind of magic?

Q: You come from a family of serious academics. What was their reaction when you chose to write genre fiction rather than something more “literary”?

A: It sounds funny to say it, but writing The Magicians was a serious act of rebellion for me. Coming from the family I do, it was an act of calculated treason. I had to nerve myself up to do it. But I had to – it was the only way I could say what I wanted to say. I couldn’t do anything else.

I think it’s fair to say that reactions were mixed. My mom was cautiously enthusiastic, and my brother and sister have been hugely helpful with the books. But I don’t think my father ever read any of The Magicians books.

Q: The Magicians books have stirred up a lot of controversy among readers. They attack or invert the most sacred conventions of fantasy, and as a result, have divided the fantasy world. Can you speak a bit about this diverse reader response?

A: No question, the Magicians books are polarizing. They’re supposed to be. The same way Neuromancer did with science fiction, and Watchmen did with superhero comics, the Magicians books ask hard questions about fantasy. What kinds of people would really do magic, if it were really, and what would the practice of magic do to them? What would really go on in a school for magic, with a bunch of teenagers in a fairy castle being given supernatural powers? What would happen if you put in all the depression and the violence and the blowjobs and the drinking that Rowling leaves out? What would happen to those kids after
they graduated? What would happen if you sent these kids through the looking glass, into a magical land that was in the grip of a civil war?

These aren’t the kinds of questions everybody wants asked, but that’s how genres evolve. Watchmen was a brutal interrogation of the superhero genre – and it was also the greatest superhero story ever written. You couldn’t write a comic book the same way after Watchmen was published. I’m not saying the Magicians books are the greatest fantasy novels ever written, but they’re asking the same kinds of questions.

Q: What were your major influences from science fiction or fantasy genres? What about more mainstream, literary works? How do you see these manifesting themselves in THE MAGICIAN’S LAND?

A: What got me started writing The Magicians was reading Susanna Clarke’s Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell in 2004. There were several novels around that time that did things with fantasy that had never been done before, used it to say things that had never been said before. George R.R. Martin’s books were like that, and so were Neil Gaiman’s, especially American Gods. So were Kelly Link’s. When I read those books, I knew that I had to be a part of whatever they were doing.

I also have a bit of an academic background – I spent a few years in graduate school, and I studied the literary canon, particularly the history of the novel, pretty intensely – and that comes out in the Magicians books too. You can find bits of Proust in them, and Fitzgerald, Woolf, Donne, Joyce, Chaucer, T.S. Eliot. You can find a lot of Evelyn Waugh – Brakebills owes a lot to Hogwarts, but it owes a lot more to the Oxford of Brideshead Revisited. I wanted to see what happens when you take techniques and tropes from literary fiction and transport them, illegally, across genre lines.

Q: As a literary critic, you’ve worked to promote the value and respectability of genre fiction – one year you put George R.R. Martin at the top of Time’s list of books of the year. You did the same with Susanna Clarke and John Green. Does that fit in with what you do as a writer of fiction?

A: In my own nerdy way I’m trying to start a revolution, or maybe I’m just trying to join one that got started without me. It’s a literary revolution, but not the usual kind, where people who are writing difficult, avant garde literature figure out a way to make it even more difficult and avant garde. I’m talking about a revolution of pleasure, where the question of a book’s worth is de-coupled from the question of whether or not it’s hard or unpleasant to read.

Q: If The Magicians, The Magician King, and THE MAGICIAN’S LAND were made into movies or a television series, who would you envision playing Quentin and his friends?

A: The challenge with the Magicians characters is to convey a lot of intelligence, and also to not be overly good-looking. They’re a clever lot, and they’re also very real – they look like real people. Ben Whishaw has probably aged out of the Quentin role, but people mention him to me a lot, and that seems right. Sometimes I pictured specific actors while I was writing – Eliot, for example, I imagine as something like Richard E. Grant in Withnail and I. I often imagine Alice as Thora Birch from Ghost World.

Q: There are a lot of tech references in The Magicians books that would seem more at home in science fiction than fantasy, ie. the origin of magic is described in hacker language. Why did you choose to juxtapose so much tech with magic?

A: I’m very committed to the project of making the Magicians books feel real, and to that end I made a deal with myself: everything that’s real in our world would be real in Quentin’s. And that means including contemporary technology, cell phones and the Internet and so on.

But beyond that, I think the same people who are interested in technology in our world would be drawn to magic if it were real, as much as the Wiccan crowd. Magic is interesting and complicated and powerful the same way technology is, and it requires some of the same mental discipline.

Also, I’m a science fiction writer manqué. I like the way SF writers look at the world. I like to think I write about magic the way good SF writers write about technology.

Q: You have a degree in comparative literature from Harvard but dropped out before getting your Ph.D. from Yale. What made you decide not to become an academic yourself?

A: I can’t even remember what made me decide I wanted to be one in the first place, except that I was unemployed and wanted to read books and talk about them as much as possible. Which I did get to do, and I loved it. But I knew from watching my parents that the life of an academic is not a glamorous one. It is frequently an underpaid and inglorious one, except for the superstars, and it quickly became apparent that I wasn’t going to be one of those. Fortunately I married one instead.

Q: You have an identical twin brother, Austin Grossman, who is also a Harvard grad and successful fantasy novelist. Why do you think you’ve traveled such similar paths professionally? How do you think growing up as twins shaped your writing, respectively?

A: It’s a mystery. I don’t know if twins have much more insight into it than regular people have. Austin was a very successful video game designer in his 20s, whereas I spent most of that decade looking for a career of any kind. But then somehow, for some reason, we re-converged. It happens all the time, not just with our writing. We live on opposite coasts, and only see each other a few times a year, but there’s always some uncanny coincidence in what we’re doing, or wearing, or listening to, or reading.

Though I’m very conscious of the differences in our work too. We’ve read the same things, seen the same movies, and watched the same shows, so our cultural points of reference are all the same. We know all the same words. But he writes only in the first person, and I only write in the third person. We use the same raw materials to construct very different stories.

Q. Over the past decade, fantasy has become more accepted in mainstream and literary circles. What do you think has changed and where do you see the genre going? Does fantasy get the respect it deserves among scholars?

A. A lot has changed for fantasy in the last decade or so. The 1990's were all about science fiction—Star Wars, Star Trek, the Matrix—but something changed around the turn of the millennium. After 2001 the popular imagination became focused on fantasy -- Harry Potter
and Twilight and The Lord of the Rings. En masse, we turned to fantasy for something we needed and weren't finding elsewhere. What that is, it’s hard to say, but it’s led to a glorious resurgence of the genre. Fantasy is evolving and maturing. It’s definitely not just for kids anymore. Writers like Neil Gaiman, Susanna Clarke, China Mieville, George RR Martin and Kelly Link are making it more complex and interesting and sophisticated and powerful than it ever was before.

But no, as far as I can tell, it still gets very little respect from the academy.

Q: What’s your favorite part of writing outside of reality?

A: What makes fantasy interesting to me is what it can’t do. Magic doesn’t solve everybody’s problems. You have characters who are capable of drawing energy from invisible sources, making it crackle from their fingers, performing miracles. But when they’re done, they’re still who they are. Life is still life. Magic doesn't change relationships. It doesn’t fix your neuroses. Those basic problems are still what they were, and they have to be solved the old-fashioned way, just like in any other novel. 
My novel The Magicians was a New York Times bestseller. So was the sequel, The Magician King. The third book in the trilogy, The Magician's Land, will be published in August 2014.

There's yet more information about me and my books on my website.


(Taken from Goodreads)

Author Links:
http://levgrossman.com/
http://levgrossman.com/blog/
http://www.twitter.com/leverus
https://www.facebook.com/lev.grossman 
The wonderful people at Viking are allowing me to give away (1) hardcover copy of The Magician's Land to a lucky reader! Open to US only!



 

August 2, 2014

Review + Giveaway: The Angel in My Pocket by Sukey Forbes

The Angel in My Pocket: A Story of Love, Loss, and Life After Death
Author: Sukey Forbes
Genre: Nonfiction/Memoir
Release Date: July 3, 2014
Publisher: Viking Adult

Description:

A grieving mother draws on her storied heritage to find her daughter in the afterlife

When Sukey Forbes lost her six-year-old daughter, Charlotte, to a rare genetic disorder, her life felt as if it were shattered forever. Descended from two distinguished New England families, Forbes was raised in a rarefied—if eccentric—life of privilege. Yet, Forbes’s family history is also rich with spiritual seekers, including her great-great-great-grandfather Ralph Waldo Emerson. On the family’s private island enclave off Cape Cod, apparitions have always been as common as the servants who once walked the back halls. But the “afterlife” took on new meaning once Forbes dipped into the world of clairvoyants to reconnect with Charlotte.

With a mission to help others by sharing her own story, Forbes chronicles a world of ghosts that reawakens us to a lost American spiritual tradition. The Angel in My Pocket is a moving and utterly unique tale of one mother’s undying love for her child.
  


https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18693638-the-angel-in-my-pocket?ac=1
The Angel in My Pocket is a magnificent mix of a mother's mission to reconnect with her deceased daughter in the afterlife, and a memoir of the author's experiences with paranormal entities and occurrences. The way the story is written, especially from the first person point of view, makes it easy to slide into the book - like the author is beside you telling the story. There are so many different aspects to the book - from the grief of losing a child and a parent's unconditional love to the mystical and unexplainable that surrounds us every day. 

I found myself immediately immersed into the story and empathizing with the author and her struggles - first in dealing with her sick daughter and then drowning in grief after her passing. I found it fascinating that the author went a very different spiritual way than most would - she followed her family's history of clairvoyance and occult tendencies to try to connect with her daughter again. I am a huge fan of the occult and ghosts, so that part of the book really fascinated me. I loved all the stories that the author shared - from old family stories to personal encounters. It really opens the mind to possibilities in the world that many discredit. The conversational tone of the memoir sent me on an emotional roller coaster - from deep sadness and grief to hope and then excitement and the endless possibilities that are out there. There's something that every person can relate to in the story, so it appeals to a wide audience of readers. I found it to be heartbreaking and beautiful - along with completely unique and thought provoking. Highly recommended for fans of all genres, as well as those who enjoy something fresh and original.

Sukey Forbes is the founder and president of an art, antiques, and interior design company and a blogger for The Huffington Post. The Angel in My Pocket is her first book. She lives with her family In Boston and San Francisco. (Taken from Goodreads)

Author Links:
Blog/Website
Twitter 
Facebook
Pinterest
Goodreads


The wonderful people at Viking are allowing me to give away (1) hardcover copy of the book to a lucky winner! Open to US only!


July 26, 2014

Book Highlight + Giveaway: Good Morning, Mr. Mandela by Zelda la Grange




Good Morning, Mr. Mandela: A Memoir
Author: Zelda la Grange
Genre: Nonfiction/Memoir
Release Date: June 24, 2014
Publisher: Viking Adult

Description:

A white Afrikaner, Zelda la Grange grew up in segregated South Africa, supporting the regime and the rules of apartheid. Her conservative family referred to the imprisoned Nelson Mandela as “a terrorist.” Yet just a few years after his release and the end of apartheid, she would be traveling the world by Mr. Mandela’s side, having grown to respect and cherish the man she would come to call "Khulu," or “grandfather."

Good Morning, Mr. Mandela tells the extraordinary story of how a young woman’s life, beliefs, prejudices—everything she once believed—were utterly transformed by the man she had been taught was the enemy. It is the incredible journey of an awkward, terrified young secretary in her twenties who rose from a job in a government typing pool to become one of the president’s most loyal and devoted associates. During his presidency she was one of his three private secretaries, and then became an aide-de-camp and spokesperson and managed his office in his retirement. Working and traveling by his side for almost two decades, La Grange found herself negotiating with celebrities and world leaders, all in the cause of supporting and caring for Mr. Mandela in his many roles.

Here La Grange pays tribute to Nelson Mandela as she knew him—a teacher who gave her the most valuable lessons of her life. The Mr. Mandela we meet in these pages is a man who refused to be defined by his past, who forgave and respected all, but who was also frank, teasing, and direct. As he renewed his country, he also freed La Grange from a closed world of fear and mistrust, giving her life true meaning. “I was fearful of so much twenty years ago—of life, of black people, of this black man and the future of South Africa—and I now was no longer persuaded or influenced by mainstream fears. He not only liberated the black man but the white man, too.”

This is a book about love and second chances that honors the lasting and inspiring gifts of one of the great men of our time. It offers a rare intimate portrait of Nelson Mandela and his remarkable life as well as moving proof of the power we all have to change.


https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/21944888-good-morning-mr-mandela?ac=1

Praise:

“In Good Morning, Mr. Mandela, Zelda la Grange recounts her remarkable life at the right hand of the man we both knew and loved. It's a tribute to both of them—to Madiba's eye for talent and his capacity for trust and to Zelda's courage to take on a great challenge and her capacity for growth. This story proves the power of making politics personal and is an important reminder of the lessons Madiba taught us all.”
—President Bill Clinton

“President Nelson Mandela’s choice of the young Afrikaner typist Zelda la Grange as his most trusted aide embodied his commitment to reconciliation in South Africa. She repaid his trust with loyalty and integrity. I have the highest regard for her.”
—Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu

“Zelda la Grange has a singular perspective on Nelson Mandela, having served as his longtime personal aide, confidante and close friend. She is a dear friend to both of us and a touchstone to all of us who loved Madiba. Her story of their journey together demonstrates how a man who transformed an entire nation also had the power to transform the life of one extraordinary woman.”
—Morgan Freeman and Lori McCreary, actor, producer of Invictus
  

Zelda la Grange was born in 1970 in Boksburg, South Africa, and began working as a secretary for the South African government in 1992. She joined the President’s office in 1994 as a typist and she became one of President Mandela’s three private secretaries in 1997. In 2002 she left government and became a full-time employee of the Nelson Mandela Foundation. 

Check out her Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/zelda.lagrange.1, or follow her on Twitter @ZeldalaGrangeSA
The fantastic people at Viking are allowing me to give away (1) hardcover copy of Good Morning, Mr. Mandela to a lucky winner! (US Only!)



 

July 8, 2014

Author Interview + Giveaway: Never Coming Back by Tim Weaver

Never Coming Back (David Raker #4)
Author: Tim Weaver
Genre: Mystery/Thriller
Release Date: July 3, 2014
Publisher: Viking Adult

Description:

A bestseller in the UK, this gripping thriller of a family that vanishes into thin air is Tim Weaver’s American debut

Emily Kane arrives at her sister Carrie’s house to find the front door unlocked, dinner on the table, and the family nowhere to be found—Carrie, her husband, and two daughters have disappeared. When the police turn up no leads, Emily turns to her former boyfriend David Raker, a missing persons investigator, to track the family down. As Raker pursues the case, he discovers evidence of a sinister cover-up, decades in the making and with a long trail of bodies behind it.

Tim Weaver’s thrillers have been hugely popular in the UK, and now Never Coming Back will introduce his beloved character David Raker to American audiences. Set in Las Vegas and a small fishing village in England, the novel is a smart, fast-paced thriller sure to keep readers guessing until the very end.
 

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18693838-never-coming-back?ac=1

Q. Where did the idea for NEVER COMING BACK come from?

A. Well, although NEVER COMING BACK is my debut here in the States, it’s actually the fourth book I’ve released in the UK, so its premise was really starting to take shape even before I’d got to the end of my third book, VANISHED. That’s generally how I work: about three-quarters of the way through one book, especially as I get a clear sight of how it’s going to end, I’ll start to think about the next one. Of course, it makes no difference if you’re coming in as a new reader at NEVER COMING BACK, because they all work perfectly well as standalones. In fact, in a strange, slightly selfish way, I think this is actually quite a nice place to begin, because it allowed me to fulfill a long-held dream of setting a novel (or, in this case, part of one) in the US. Since I started reading seriously as a teen, American writers have had a profound impact on my tastes, on my ambitions, and – ultimately – my style.

That said, I never once anticipated the scope or the challenge involved in setting a book in two countries – the UK and US – and maybe that was for the best. If I was the type of writer who planned everything meticulously from day one (I’m not: I just write), I might never have made it through the planning stages! NEVER COMING BACK is geographically and historically big, which was a challenge to knit together in itself, but it’s also got a different ‘feel’ to my other novels, especially coming off VANISHED, which was set in and around the London Underground. Where that was very claustrophobic, deliberately so, NEVER COMING BACK is the total opposite: a book full of space and scale.

So it was a big, frightening, extremely exciting journey, which gave me countless sleepless nights along the way, but the reaction to it in the UK has – thankfully – been wonderful. Obviously, I hope it now manages to find an audience here in the States too.

Q. Your David Raker series is already a bestseller in England, but NEVER COMING BACK is your American debut. How did you feel when you found out you’d be published in the US?

A. Do-a-little-jig-around-the-room excited! I’d spent a lot of time in the States during my time as a magazine journalist, love the country and the culture, and had grown up reading American crime fiction. It was basically all I read. Although my novels are all set in the UK (apart from the Vegas sections in NEVER COMING BACK), my hope is that they share that ‘widescreen’ feel that American crime fiction does so well, the sense of being “big”, both in setting and ambition. When you read someone like Michael Connelly, you immediately – just from Bosch being based in a city as huge, distinct and unique as L.A. – get that scope and breadth. I love that. Great American thrillers like THE POET, like Scott Smith’s A SIMPLE PLAN, like RED DRAGON and SILENCE OF THE LAMBS, were what made me want to be a writer.

Q. What about the thriller/mystery genre interests you?

A. There’s an unpredictability to it, both as a reader and a writer, which I love. As I said, I don’t plan my books (although I always have a vague sense of where they’re headed), and constructing a mystery, one that combines characters you care about, locations you can breathe in, twists, tension and scares, is like a puzzle. As a writer, you’re second guessing the reader the whole time, trying to predict where their suspicions will fall; as a reader, you’re second guessing the writer, trying to work out where they’re taking you. It’s a game that I think is uniquely suited to this particular genre.

Q. What writers have influenced you?

A. Michael Connelly, definitely. I was 16 when THE BLACK ECHO came out, and I remember being blown away by it. He did a series of books after that - THE BLACK ICE, THE CONCRETE BLONDE, THE LAST COYOTE, TRUNK MUSIC, THE POET, BLOOD WORK - that were just sensational, and he did them one after another. I actually think he’s a bit of a genius.

I also loved John Connolly’s early novels. EVERY DEAD THING through to THE WHITE ROAD, THE UNQUIET too: not only were they incredible thrillers - taut and scary, with some of the best villains in crime fiction - but he’s a wonderful writer as well; a real lyricist.

Mostly, though, when I'm asked this question, I think of individual books that have remained with me long after I turned the last page: A SIMPLE PLAN, as I mentioned above, which is - hands down - one of the best thrillers I’ve ever read; MARATHON MAN by William Goldman, a masterclass in sleight of hand; the harrowing history lesson in Mo Hayder’s THE DEVIL OF NANKING (neé TOKYO); Stephen King’s THE GREEN MILE, which is such a wonderful, emotional character piece... I could go on and on. There's also a book called THE BANG BANG CLUB, which I love. It's the real-life account of four photo-journalists working the South African townships in the run-up to the 1994 elections, and it's absolutely amazing. It was a major reason why I had David Raker start out life as a journalist. You’ll see a lot of THE BANG BANG CLUB in the Raker series, especially in the early books.

Q. What was it like to draw a picture of characters who are so cold blooded and terrifying?
How do you prepare, or unwind from it?

A. For me, writing is like this: I get into the head of the characters, and then - once I’ve done my work for the day - I press Save, turn off the computer, and crash in front of the TV! I wouldn’t say I ever entirely ‘switch off’ from a book, because while I'm writing one I’m thinking about it all the time, even if only peripherally - but I certainly don’t have any difficulty extracting myself from the writing process. In fact, when it’s going badly, it’s all too easy to down tools and think, “I’ll just go and watch Game of Thrones, and come back to the book tomorrow”!

The villains in my books aren't nice people, clearly, but I hope that they're more than just “bad”. Motive is important, and equally important is to paint these characters as three-dimensional, as men or women with a history. I think one of my favorite reviews of my third book VANISHED, was when a reviewer said she felt enormously conflicted about the villain, about whether she was scared by him (which she said she was) or felt sorry for him (which she admitted she did). I think you can have both. In fact, that conflict is central to building a convincing world.

Q. NEVER COMING BACK jumps from a small fishing town in England to the desert of Las Vegas. Why Las Vegas?


A. I’d set three books in London, and although it’s a fascinating place, full of history and stories - and a place Raker returns to, at least in part, in my fifth book - by NEVER COMING BACK, I was ready for a change. The choice of a small, rain swept fishing village on England's south coast was deliberate: suddenly, I got to talk about emptiness, about big skies and vast seas, about a place where everybody knew each other, and where the crimes couldn’t so easily be hidden. London, like any big city, has a certain anonymity, and I used that to my advantage, especially in THE DEAD TRACKS and VANISHED. The village in NEVER COMING BACK was different, less ambiguous, and a whole new challenge as a storyteller.
I’d been carrying around an idea for years, about a big, historical crime that crosses international borders, but it wasn’t until I started NEVER COMING BACK that I thought seriously about juxtaposing the tiny, insular nature of the fishing village with the gaudy excess of Las Vegas. Vegas was a place I’d visited a few years before I started writing the book, and - from the moment I landed - I was completely fascinated by it. It’s such a uniquely American construct, a city that couldn’t exist anywhere else; this exhilarating, intimidating, seedy, frightening, and - in its own way - utterly tragic monument to excess. As a boy from the English countryside, where nothing ever happens, it was like landing on another planet!

So, I combined the two, weaving them together into the plot I’d been thinking about for all those years, and the Vegas sections became my love letter to the American crime and mystery fiction I grew up reading. I enjoyed the experience so much that I’m definitely going to return to the States at some point. It just has to be for the right story.


Q. Who would be in your dream book club?

A. This is always such a tricky question, because different books mean different things to you at different stages of your life. What I thought might be more interesting is a list of 20 books that I’d consider to have had an actual, tangible influence on the David Raker series…

THE NEON RAIN by James Lee Burke

DISGRACE by JM Coetzee
THE LONG GOODBYE by Raymond Chandler
FOUR CORNERS OF NIGHT by Craig Holden
MARATHON MAN by William Goldman
THE GREEN MILE by Stephen King
I AM LEGEND by Richard Matheson

RED DRAGON by Thomas Harris
A SIMPLE PLAN by Scott Smith
DARK HOLLOW by John Connolly
THE POET by Michael Connelly
FATHERLAND by Robert Harris
THE DEVIL OF NANKING by Mo Hayder
THE BANG BANG CLUB by Greg Marinovich and Joao Silva

THE LOVELY BONES by Alice Sebold
THE ODESSA FILE by Frederick Forsyth
THE BOYS FROM BRAZIL by Ira Levin
DIE TRYING by Lee Child
DOUBLE INDEMNITY by James M. Cain

COUNTRY OF MY SKULL by Antjie Krog

Q. What’s next for David Raker?

A. Next is the fifth Raker, FALL FROM GRACE, which comes out in the UK on August 14. Where NEVER COMING BACK is quite ‘big’ in terms of its themes and its scope, I think this is a little smaller and more intimate, though it too centers on an old crime. I’m always incredibly conscious of keeping the series fresh, of adapting its DNA and pushing it in new directions, but at the same time it's important to retain the building blocks that have carried the novels through to this point. However, while change is inevitable, there’s one thing you can always be certain of in a Raker book: someone, somewhere will be missing.
Tim Weaver was born in 1977. At eighteen, he left school and started working in magazine journalism, and has since gone on to develop a successful career writing about films, TV, sports, games and technology. He is married with a young daughter, and lives near Bath, England. Visit him at visit www.timweaverbooks.com
Giveaway: Thanks to the wonderful people at Viking, I have (1) hardcover copy of Never Coming Back for a lucky reader! Open to US only!

  

June 12, 2014

The Ways of the Dead: Author Q&A + Giveaway

The Ways of the Dead: A Novel
Author: Neely Tucker
Genre: Mystery/Thriller
Release Date: June 12, 2014
Publisher: Viking Adult

Description:

When the body of Sarah Reese—the pretty teenage daughter of a prominent federal judge—is found in an alley in a rundown section of Washington D.C., the police quickly arrest three local black kids known to be at the scene of her death. The case appears to be cut and dry until Sully Carter arrives. Back from reporting in war-torn Bosnia with serious injuries and an even more severe chip on his shoulder, Carter spends as much time drinking and speeding around D.C. on his 1993 Ducati 916 as he does filing stories. Almost immediately, Carter gets the feeling there’s more to the case than the police suspect. Reese’s slaying might be related to a string of cold cases the police barely investigated, among them the recent disappearance of a gorgeous university student. He also can’t help but notice that a white girl’s murder is front page news, but the disappearance of multiple African American and Latina women have been left unsolved.

Against pressure from Judge Reese, Carter’s bosses at the paper, and a powerful drug dealer who runs the area around Princeton Place, Carter races to link the crimes into a cohesive story. Set against the backdrop of D.C.’s broad avenues and shady backstreets, Tucker tells a story that juxtaposes blighted neighborhoods shadowed by pristine monuments of power. THE WAYS OF THE DEAD takes readers into the fast-paced, deadline-driven newsroom that Tucker knows so intimately. This propulsive thriller is perfect for fans of George Pelecanos and Elmore Leonard.

Praise:

“Crisp, crafty and sharply observed . . . Rich yet taut description, edgy storytelling, rock-and-rolling dialogue, and a deeply flawed but compelling hero add up to a luminous first novel.”
Kirkus Reviews (Starred Review)

“With the emphasis on gritty urban life in a city rife with racism and blight, [The Ways of the Dead] evokes the Washington, D.C., of George Pelecanos. This riveting debut novel should spawn a terrific series.”
Booklist (Starred Review)

“[An] exciting fiction debut . . . The brisk plot is punctuated by an insightful view of journalism and manipulative editors, shady politicians, and apathetic cops, while also showing residents working to create a better neighborhood. Readers will be pleased that Tucker leaves room for a sequel.”
Publishers Weekly

“With a very powerful beginning and a very shocking end, this debut novel is a great read that shows suspense/thriller lovers that they do, most definitely, have a new series to fall in love with.”
Suspense Magazine

“THE WAYS OF THE DEAD is a great read. Deep characters, pitch perfect dialogue and a plot with as many curves as the Rock Creek Parkway as it moves through the side of Washington D.C. far away from the Smithsonian. Neely Tucker takes this novel up an even further notch with a story framed around the hot button issues of our time, including race, justice and the media. If this is Tucker's first novel, I can't wait for what's coming next.”
Michael Connelly

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18693836-the-ways-of-the-dead?ac=1

You’ve been a journalist for 25 years, but are now turning to fiction. What prompted the switch? Have you always wanted to write novels?

I got started in journalism more or less by accident. I was a theater and English major in college and, while I was a junior, got offered a reporting job in town at what was the smallest daily newspaper in Mississippi (the Oxford Eagle). It paid $4.50 cents an hour and the radio station I was working at the time paid $4.25.I was paying my way through school, so there you go. I thought I'd stay in papers for a few years, move around some, learn to write sentences and then, I don't know, move to a mountain cabin and write fiction. It wasn't terribly clear how that part was going to work. Then I got to moving around a lot more than I planned and it was great -- Miami, Detroit, Europe, the Middle East, Africa -- and then I had kids. All that time, I never really considered myself a newspaper guy. In my mind, I was a writer who was paying the bills by working at a newspaper. I finally remembered the part about writing something else. No mountain cabin, though.

What has been the biggest difference about writing a novel over newspaper stories?

That you can just make stuff up and not get fired for it. It's even encouraged! I had this weird little moment when I was talking to my agent about the finished manuscript and I kept wanting to say, "Now, you know I just made all this up, right? It didn't really happen?" It was this thing I had going through my head. And I found this fictional aspect to be a tremendous amount of fun. If I wanted Sully Carter to have a drink at his desk, well, he did. If I wanted him to say lots of really bad words, he turned loose. So I loved that. That said, I worked on this book over a three-year period around the day job, and it was sometimes a challenge to keep some of the minor characters  looking and acting just the same. One guy grew three inches. One went from being a Detroit native to being from West Virginia. So I eventually created an Old Testament sort of "bible-of-the-book" that said who begat who and whatnot. It kept everybody in line and stopped them from shape-shifting.

Your first book, Love in the Driest Season, was a very successful memoir. How has the publishing process been different this time around?

It's much looser. "Season" was a pretty serious book, primarily about adopting our daughter in a country (Zimbabwe) where journalists like me were declared to be "enemies of the state."  We were living in the U.S. by the time the book came out, but I was always nervous that the Zimbabwean government might take offense and try to take our daughter back, in an  Elian Gonzalez kind of way. They didn't, thank heavens. On this book, all I have to worry about is people saying, "Hey, you suck!" which is no big deal. Reporters get that all the time, particularly in a town as given to name-calling as Washington.

As a writer for the Washington Post, you’ve profiled big name thriller and mystery writers. What did you learn about the genre from these authors? Who are some of your favorite mystery writers?

The main thing you learn from successful writers is that they find out they have a certain  process -- and then they replicate that process. Your stories can vary wildly, but your approach probably needs to be the same. Elmore Leonard wrote from nine to five, a couple of pages a day, and let the ending work itself out. He never know how it was going to end until it did. Michael Connelly has a definite beginning and end, but let's the middle part work itself out. Richard North Patterson is very conscious and deliberate about setting up twists, particularly the end. "It's a shame not to surprise your readers with your ending, but it is a shame to surprise yourself," he said. Ann Patchett, who doesn't exactly write mysteries but does write about books with narrative tension, can't write a book with cell phones in it, or ones that work all the time, because it drives her crazy with how to keep knowledge from certain characters. So all of these are very successful writers and they all write differently. The thing that they do is recognize their process -- even down to daily routines and time management -- and then replicate it. It's like that ad about sports superstitions: It's only crazy if it doesn't work.... For favorite current mystery writers, it depends on the day, but it's fair enough today to say the above list and throw in Richard Price and Gillian Flynn.  

The Ways of the Dead is based on a real series of murders in the D.C. area—the Princeton Place murders of the ‘90s. How did you choose these as a model? How much did you already know about them?

I was covering D.C. Courts from 2000-2002, after having just returned from abroad. The Princeton Place killings had already happened, but the case was coming up for trial, which would be my beat So I was doing a lot of research, principally on the suspect. Just as it was coming to trial, I sold my first book and had to take leave to write it. I never really got to do anything on that case. So I said, "Well, fine, I'll just make it the basis for a novel." It really started then, developing a cast of characters. I wanted the crime to set off a media event that would then play out in  public and in people's personal lives, with the tension of trying to make those two realities mesh. I've always been struck, as a reporter, by how you can never really know everything that happens in something as serious as a homicide. How can you put something in the paper -- the public eye -- when you can't see the whole puzzle? That's the terror of it.

Race, and the way it plays into criminal justice and criminal investigations, is a focus of your novel. What do you hope readers will take away from this part of the narrative? What has or hasn’t changed in how minorities are treated by our criminal justice system?

Part of what the story plays with are racial expectations in the ways certain narratives play out in mass media. As in: Rich White Girl Killed in Bad Neighborhood, Three Black Teens Arrested. Once a story like that hits, it sets off a lot of alarm bells and reactions in society that may or may not have anything to do with the actual facts of the case at hand. People who are a thousand miles away will suddenly become experts on what happened, with an emotional, inflexible point of view. You saw this in the Trayvon Martin case -- people on both sides dug in. It became a Rorschach test for one's social viewpoint on race and crime in America. Of course, that sort of emotion can be manipulated by people at the core of the event, which is part of what "The Ways of the Dead" is about -- be very, very careful about what you think you know.

Your main character, Sully Carter, is rough around the edges and tends to play by his own rules. How did his character begin to take shape? What’s next for him?

I first heard the name "Sully Carter" at my great-aunt's funeral in West Memphis, Ark.,about a dozen years ago. He was a distant relative whom I'd never met and was apparently sort of a character. My uncle's wife kept saying in the car on the way to the cemetery, "Oh, Sully Carter did this," and "Can you believe Sully Carter did that." She kept using both names. And I thought that's perfect, both names like that. We were crossing the Mississippi River about that time, and so it just came to me that the fictional Sully Carter would be from the right by the river. That gave him a lot of his character and attitude, that sort of rough-hewn, Southern, hard-by-the-river kind of thing. So by the time this sort of guy would have gotten to Washington, he would have a real chip on his shoulder about dealing with authority and the high and mighty.... Next for Sully is a story that has to do with the Washington Channel, a suicide and the D.C.-area slave trade. The working title is "The Well of Time" and it has some of the same themes as this book -- the way in which the past makes us who we are, white and black, rich and poor, in complicated ways that can't be predicted.

The novel is set in the ‘90’s before smart phones, social media, and the blogosphere changed the way we get information and interact with the media. Why did you decide to set it in this time period? Did you find yourself becoming nostalgic for this bygone era?

I very much wanted to set this in the last of the glory days for American newspapers. The fading of an era is tremendously appealing to write about, at least to me, and this was a time period I knew a good bit about, in a field I'd been working for a long time. When I started at a small-town paper in the 1980s, there was this romantic sort of ideal to what would make a good reporter -- say, somebody who'd maybe gotten a little college, but who had bounced around, worked on a shrimp boat, in a bar, as a field hand, driven a truck. Somebody who knew the hard end of life, wrote like an angel and had a fantastic bullshit meter. That's a world class reporter. Sully has some of that, when his temper isn't getting in the way. So I put him in the twilight of the era and let him start causing trouble.  

Without giving away too much, what does the title signify?

It's a world view that's inherent in the book and is expressed in one phrase in particular. Most narrowly, the dead leave clues as to how they died, and so by studying the ways of the dead you might can understand their lives and perhaps who killed them. But the larger point is that the dead never really leave us alone. They are always with us. So, in the larger sense, the ways of the dead are the ways of ourselves, of the ways of the living, and by studying them, we get to know ourselves.

Your career in journalism has taken you all over the world. How do you bring those experiences into your fiction?

It informs almost everything I do. I grew up in the Deep South, traveled over a good bit of the globe, and have a lot of experiences that show you the world through another prism. Once, I was in the south of France, the foothills of the Alps, looking down at Monte Carlo at night. The lights, the sea, the hills -- who wouldn't say this is fabulous? But I was walking with a pair of Romanian clandestines who were sneaking into the country illegally. So we were snooping past these million dollar homes and, eventually, my interpreter and I were chased off a small cliff by a couple of guard dogs. We spent the night on a steep incline, braced against a couple of bushes, freezing our fannies off. This woman I barely know and I, literally wrapped around each other. From that vantage point, Monte Carlo didn't look like paradise. It looked like rich people in a police-protected bubble, which is exactly how the young Romanian couple saw it. One place, multiple realities. I think that's invaluable for writing anything, particularly fiction.

Sully shares a name with a four-legged member of your family. Tell us about the real-life Sully.

Sully the big black dog is our 140-pound Rotweiller. He's five now, and I had this book in mind when we got him as a puppy. We named him Sully to remind me to work on the book, so I guess it's not clear who's named after who. I write in an upstairs office that opens onto a small balcony that overlooks the street. Sully likes to sit by me and then walk out on the balcony and bark like hell at people walking by. Scares the daylights out of strangers, they hear this dog with a voice that sounds like the gates of hell have opened, they look around, there's nothing there....and then they look up and see him on the second floor. Our neighbors know him, so they just wave and say "Hey Sully!" and he goes to wiggling his stump, or flops down and takes a nap. He also likes to sleep under my feet while I'm writing, which I like. He's doesn't talk much, so he's good company.
Neely Tucker is a veteran journalist with a career spanning twenty-five years, fourteen of which he’s spent at The Washington Post. His 2004 memoir, Love in the Driest Season, was named one of the Best 25 Books of the year by Publishers Weekly. Born in Mississippi, Tucker lives with his family in Bethesda, Maryland.
 Giveaway: The awesome people at Viking are allowing me to give away (1) finished copy of the book to (1) reader!! US Only!